Why does the US Navy maintain like an unreasonable policy? Adding now another embarrassing incident to a drawn out string of unreasonable actions.

Why does the US Navy maintain like an unreasonable policy?

Adding now another embarrassing incident to a drawn out string of unreasonable actions, the Federal conduct on part of the US Navy, has filed a lawsuit against Minnesota resident Lex Cralley demanding the respond of the wreckage of a Brewster-built F3A-1 Corsair along with compensation for "any damage to or alteration of the World War sum of two units fighter.

This particular Corsair crashed in North Carolina upon 19 December 1944 while onward a training Right from MCAS Cherry Point. The pilot was killed and, after removal of his dead body Navy personnel stripped the aircraft of its weapons and other equipment before abandoning the plane in the swamp where it crashed.

Cralley discovered the wreckage in 1990 and remov the pieces and transported them to his household where he began a long-term restoration cast "I'm just a little guy" said Cralley who is an A&P mechanic, "I have no wealth, work for a living, have four kids."

The lawsuit doesn't state to what end the pieces of the plane are in such a manner important to the Navy. In a typically pompous statement, Charles Miller, a spokesman for the Justice Department's civil division in Washington, stated "We're not going to provide anything more than what we'll be saying in court."

These aircraft are not the exclusive right of the US Navy - they are the thing owned of the American taxpayer and it is amazing that if the Navy finds this aircraft of like value and historic interest, that they did not retrieve the machine from its final resting place in a swamp. They certainly knew where it was.

...

Home